Vitalik Buterin Discloses The Grudge Against Ripple And Its Token, A Few Rippleās Executives Responded

The Ethereumās founder has taken it upon himself to make known his belief that Ethereum proponents are not under any obligation or compulsion to stand in support of Rippleās XRP in the ongoing case between Ripple and SEC.
The Ethereumās Buterin has made it on his Twitter handle that the XRP has lost its right to protection as they attempt to throw Ethereum under the bus as āChina-controlledā IMO
Buterin stated:
It looks like the Ripple/XRP team is sinking to new levels of strangeness. Theyāre claiming that their shitcoin should not be called security for public policy reasons, namely because Bitcoin and Ethereum are āChinese-controlledā.
Following the new Canadian crypto regulations that limit the value of crypto citizens of particular regions can buy per year to $30k, although, this new regulation excludes Bitcoin Ethereum and 2 other coins such as the Bitcoin Cash, and Litecoin, an Ethereum proponent by the name David Hoffman stood to speak for the coins affected by this regulation.
Read Also: Do Kwon Made A Move To Have A Legal Backing: Detail
Buterin responded to the stand of David Hoffman, āGlad to see Ethereum people pushing against regulations that privilege ETH over other legitimate cryptocurrencies,ā
The Ethereum proponent replied that he wouldnāt have said anything if the crypto in question was XRP.
XRP Community Members Responded
Following Buterinās statement, the Ripple executives and XRP community members stated their views on the whole issue. For instance, Rippleās chief technology officer, David Schwartz, said that Ethereum had pioneered the act of promoting government actions against other projects just because the project refused to understand their narratives.
He also clarified the reason for Buterinās response, that the basis of Rippleās argument at the time was that most Bitcoin and Ethereum miners were residents in China and, subject to Chinese policy controls, going further to compare miners to company shareholders.
In this same premise, Jeremy Hogan, The Rippleās attorney, compares the Ethereum founderās statements to that of a mafia don, highlighting Buterinās use of the word protection. Also, the attorney in charge of the Amici status in Rippleās case with SEC, John E. Deaton, stated several XRP holders without affiliation to Ripple did not know the firm but lost their savings due to the āSECās overreach.ā

Cryptolifedigital is a cryptocurrency blogger and analyst known for providing insightful analysis and commentary on the ever-changing digital currency landscape. With a keen eye for market trends and a deep understanding of blockchain technology, Cryptolifedigital helps readers navigate the complexities of the crypto world, making informed investment decisions. Whether youāre a seasoned investor or just starting out, Cryptolifedigitalās analysis offers valuable insights into the world of cryptocurrency.